Design of Cure Cycles for Thick Section Composites
Written by Prof. R. L. McCullough
OBJECTIVES
The objectives of this assignment are to:
- Design a cure cycle for a composite plate (comprised of stacks of
woven glass fabric impregnated with a thermosetting vinylester resin) that
yields good part quality in minimum processing time.
- Evaluate the performance of the cure cycle by fabricating the plate
and
- monitoring temperatures within the plate during curing stage
of the experiment;
- inspecting the cured plate for voids, delaminations, poor
compaction.
APPROACH
A simple plate geometry will be used as the basic structure. The
finished composite plate will have the dimensions of 8" X 8" and a
thickness of 1". The plate will be composed of 42 sheets of glass fabric
that will be compressed mechanically to the desired thickness. The mold
will then be injected with a low viscosity vinyl ester resin until the
fibers are saturated and the mold is full. A diagram of the experimental
apparatus is shown in Figure 1. The mold consists of two aluminum heating
plates, two 0.75" stainless steel plates that define the top and bottom of
the composite, and a center 1" thick stainless steel piece that defines
the edges of the composite. The central piece is drilled and tapped for
two resin injection ports, two vent ports, and a port for thermocouple
wires. A hydraulic ram is used to compress the fiber mats into the mold
and seal the mold closed. An electric heater is used to control the
temperature of water circulating through the aluminum heating plates.
The temperature can be varied from 20 °C to 95 °C.
Existing cure simulation computer programs and literature values
for input parameters will be used to predict temperature and extent of
reaction profiles through the thickness of the composite plate for various
temperature cycles of the heat press. A preliminary temperature cycle
will be selected which minimizes the peak temperature observed in the
center of the composite, ensures the composite cures inside/out once the
gel point is reached, and maintains a curing time less than 1.5 hours.
The sensitivity of the above criteria will be investigated with respect to
variations in key input parameters. An experimental characterization
program will be designed to obtain values of the key input parameters for
the current batch of materials. If necessary, the cure cycle will be
modified to reflect any batch-to-batch variation of the current material
from previously reported values.
During fabrication, thermocouples will be embedded at appropriate
locations within the composite to monitor the temperature at various
locations during cure. Variations from model predictions will be used to
evaluate the design of the cure cycle
The cured part will be inspected by microscopy to evaluate the
quality and uniformity of the compaction of the plies; the content of
polymer and void in the finished part will be determined.
BACKGROUND
Composite materials are comprised of stiff, strong, low-density
fibers embedded in a continuous matrix phase. Through control of the
placement of the fibers, these low-weight materials can achieve
performance levels that exceed metals.
Currently, the dominant form of composite materials utilize
thermosetting polymeric materials as the matrix phase. In the presence of
a catalyst, heat, radiation and/or pressure, thermosetting resins solidify
through an irreversible exothermic chemical reaction or "cure". Prior to
cure, the polymer is a viscous fluid that can be made to flow under
pressure. As the cure reactions proceed, the molecules react to form a
covalently bonded three-dimensional network. The increasing molecular
weight is accompanied by an increase in viscosity. At the gel-point, a
loose three-dimensional network pervades the system, the polymer exhibits
the behavior of a gel, and flow ceases. However, the reactions continue
and form a tightly cross-linked structure with the characteristics of a
glassy solid.
The resin transfer molding (RTM) process is widely used to
fabricate composite materials. Dry reinforcing fibers are impregnated by
a low viscosity thermosetting resin, which, upon curing, provides
integrity to the assembly. The process is begun by placing the dry fiber
sheets into the mold cavity. Thermocouples are placed within the mold at
this time to later monitor the temperatures within the part during the
curing cycle. Once the fibers are placed and the mold is closed, the
resin is injected into the mold. This is achieved by applying pressure
(via compressed air) to the surface of a resin reservoir, which forces the
resin into the mold and through the fiber preform. The injection process
is continued until no air bubbles are seen in the exiting resin.
Once the mold is completely filled, the curing cycle of the resin
can begin. The water heater is set to a temperature that was deemed
adequate from the simulation results. Once the resin in the center of the
composite begins to gel (as seen by a large temperature increase, or
"exotherm"), it may be desirable to increase the water temperature to
reduce the temperature difference between the center and the surface of
the composite and speed up the curing process. Although this should be
verified by the simulation, realize that the simulated results may not
accurately place the exotherms in time, due to inaccuracies in the model
parameters. Once the entire composite is thought to have reached over 90%
cured, the mold can be separated and the part removed. The part is then
placed in an oven at 120 °C to complete the cure.
A minimal successful cure cycle is defined in terms of several
non-mechanical criteria:
- all of the polymer must have achieved a minimum acceptable degree of
cure;
- the formation of voids must be prevented such that the number and size
of all voids are below an acceptable limit;
- the temperature must remain below some critical value at which damage to
the structure may occur through polymer degradation;
- the part must be cured uniformly such that large gradients in degree of
conversion or temperature are avoided -- the presence of such gradients
will result in residual stresses which detract from the performance of the
part.
Parts that meet these minimal standards are subsequently subjected to
mechanical characterizations to evaluate performance characteristics such
as rigidity, strength, fracture toughness, damage tolerance, etc.
The goal of the cure cycle designer is to meet these criteria by
properly selecting the temperature cycle applied to the laminate to allow
complete, uniform, controlled cure while completing the cure process in as
short a period of time as possible to reduce the cost of producing the
part. A major problem encountered in curing thick section laminates is
the control of the reaction exotherm and heat transfer in order to achieve
uniform cure and minimum residual stresses. The problem is aggravated by
the poor and non-isotropic thermal conductivity of the assembly.
The traditional practice in cure cycle design has been to cure
several parts by different trial cycles until a cycle was obtained which
resulted in a satisfactory product. This procedure is lengthy, costly,
and inefficient; it does not insure optimal cure cycles. Recently,
efforts have been directed at developing models which simulate the cure
process in order to facilitate the design of cure cycles. These models
can also serve as the basis of a monitoring system for on-line control of
the cure process.
The cure process is characterized by three physical-chemical
processes:
- mass transfer with chemical reactions;
- heat transfer with internal heat generation;
- the fluid dynamics of the flow of the polymer.
These features are characteristic of traditional chemical processes that
have been modeled by application of the principles of chemical reactor
engineering. In general, cure process models may be generated through the
linking of three submodels. The thermodynamic data, chemical kinetic rate
equations (coupled with diffusion limitations) and chemoviscosity
equations can be generated by a Thermokinetic Model which requires
physical and chemical data specific for the materials under consideration.
The outputs from this model may be used as input to a Heat Transfer model
to generate temperature-time cycles. The heat transfer model is specific
to the geometry of the part. Consequently, the part must be specified in
terms of shape (e.g., flat plate), dimensions, stacking sequence of plies
and composition of the plies.)
The chemical and physical information required for the current
selection of materials can be grouped into three categories.
- Reaction Characteristics: The pertinent cure reactions must be
identified. Knowledge is required of the reaction kinetics and reaction
activation energy as determined from initial reaction rates at various
temperatures in the appropriate range. In some cases the role of
diffusion should be taken into account in the later states of the cure as
the mobility of the reacting species is diminished. The heat of reaction
and the rate of heat generation must be available. Fourier Transform
Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and/or Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)
provide useful characterization tools for obtaining this data.
- Thermal Characteristics: Descriptors such as thermal
conductivity, specific heat and density are required. These descriptors
for the laminate are frequently estimated by employing "Combining Rules"
that predict laminate properties in terms of the stacking geometry and the
volume fraction concentration and properties of the fiber and polymer
components.
- Chemo-Rheological Characteristics: The viscosity of the polymer
as a function of temperature and extent of cure should be available. In
addition, the gelation time and the dependence of the "Glass Transition
Temperature" (Tg) on extent of cure should be known.
Some or all of the above information may be available from
material handbooks and/or published studies. In the event that published
data is used as a basis for the design of a cure cycle, it is prudent to
investigate the sensitivity of the predictions of the simulation to
variations in key input parameters. Due to batch-to-batch variations in
the resin materials, a direct characterization of key parameters of the
current batch of material may be warranted.
Prior to evaluating mechanical performance, the part should be
inspected to identify flaws that detract from the performance. Local
areas in which the plies did not bond can be identified by nondestructive
inspection with ultrasonic techniques. An evaluation of the uniformity of
the part usually requires destructive sectioning and microscopic
examinations to determine (i) variations in the final thickness of the
individual plies throughout the thickness of the part, and (ii) the number
and size distribution of small voids. Interpretation of mechanical
testing data requires knowledge of the weight or volume fraction of fiber
and resin in the finished part. This data can be obtained by "ashing" or
acid digestion to remove the polymer from a representative specimen of
known mass. If the part is essentially free of voids, the concentration
of fiber in the finished part may be determined from density measurements
obtained with a density gradient column.
PLANNING & SCHEDULING
The realization of the technical objectives of this assignment
will require careful planning and scheduling of a variety of activities.
While a complete characterization of the required parameters for the
Thermokinetic, Heat Transfer, and Flow/Compaction Models for the current
materials system would be desirable, it is evident that such a protocol
would extend well beyond the allotted time for the assignment.
Consequently, the successful completion of the assignment is strongly
dependent upon the technical judgement exercised in selecting the minimum
amount of new characterization data required to design a cure cycle to
produce an acceptable product. This aspect of the assignment is intended
to familiarize the student team with the normal environment (i.e., limited
time and resources) encountered in a professional assignment.
The following suggestions are offered as guidelines for
accomplishing the objectives of this assignment.
A
Prior to the scheduled pre-lab interview, the student team should:
- Gain familiarity with the language and concepts associated with the
project.
- Identify resources and collect the required technical information.
- Schedule an appointment with the instructor and/or teaching assistant to
gain clarification of issues and procedures.
- Exercise the cure simulations to establish sensitivities to input
parameters.
The scheduled pre-lab discussion should cover the following items:
- Justification for the selection of the particular characterization
experiments.
- Specification of the assignment and responsibilities of each team
member.
- A realistic schedule of activities consistent with delivering a timely
final report and recommendations.
The preliminary data report should include:
- Key results from the sensitivity analysis of the cure simulation.
- Key results from the selected characterization experiments.
- Drafts of Figures, Tables, and Schematics that will appear in the final
report.
- An outline of the final report.
The final report should contain:
- A brief statement of the problem which emphasizes the major issues.
- A succinct review of the approach and concepts used in establishing the
model relationships used in the simulation. The key simplifying
assumptions should be identified.
- A summary of all input parameters used in the simulation. Input
parameters obtained from new characterizations should be identified.
- Appropriate plots comparing predicted and measured temperature profiles.
- Appropriate photographs and/or plots describing the quality of the
product.
- An evaluation of the proposed design of the cure cycle.
- An assessment of the limitations of the current Thermokinetic and Heat
Transfer models.
- Recommendations for future work.
RESOURCES
Papers & Reports:
"Composites" T. W. Chou, R. L. McCullough, and R. B. Pipes, Scientific
American, October Issue, pg. 193-203 (1986).
"Composite Materials" J. K. Lees, A. K. Dingra, and R. L. McCullough,
Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, A7, (Fifth Edition) pg.
376-410 (1986).
"Processing Science of Thick-Section Composites," D. E. Hanks, M. C. Lee,
R. C. Young, and Y. A. Tajima, SAMPE Quarterly, 19, No. 2 (January) pg.
19-28 (1988). A Case Study.
"Reinforced Plastics: Theory and Practice," M. W. Gaylord, Koppers Co.
publication, pg. 27-38 (1969)
"Resin Transfer Molding," L. Fong and S. G. Advani, Center for Composite
Materials, University of Delaware, CCM Report 95-09, April 1995.
"Cure Behavior of Unsaturated Polyester Resin Composites," D. C. Adams,
Senior Thesis, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Delaware,
CCM Report 88-16, (1988).
ÒProcess Induced Stress and Deformation in Thick-Section Thermosetting
Composites,Ó Travis A. Bogetti, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of
Mechanical Engineering, University of Delaware, CCM Report 89-32, Chapters
2 and 3, pp. 14-114.
Computer Programs:
Contact : Prof. Roy McCullough (Center for Composite Materials).
Characterization Equipment:
Chemical Characterization Laboratory, Room 117, Composites Manufacturing
Science Laboratory, Center for Composite Materials, University of Delaware
Fabrication Equipment:
Preform and Resin Preparation, Room 227, Composites Fabrication
Laboratory
Composites Manufacturing Science Laboratory, Center for Composite
Materials, University of Delaware
Contact: Anthony Thirovong (ext.8601)
Resin Transfer Molding, Room 220-B
Composites Manufacturing Science Laboratory, Center for Composite
Materials, University of Delaware
Contact: Anthony Thirovong (ext.8601)